Competition Time!

Greetings everyone - I hope your week is off to a good start. I have been a busy chap and thought I would use the blog post this week to give you an update on stuff that is currently in the pipeline. This is the July 4th week, with the holiday (in the US) on Friday. While this may lead to  a number of sunburns and about the same number of hangovers, it will have exactly no effect on this week’a programming - in fact, I have several extra activities to be taking care of at the end of this week. One of these is my rescheduled interview with Kelly Boesch. We had to cancel the planned meeting on Thursday but have it on the book for July 3rd. I am going to give you a couple of additional links to my favorite Kelly Boesch releases from the last few weeks. Be sure to send over any questions you would like me to ask her during the interview. I was planning to take a minute to explain what an artist like Kelly does and why it is so difficult to attain the skills she has in such abundance, but on further reflection I decided that this is exactly why I invited her to share her story with us in the first place - to educate us on how she makes this amazing art. So that is what I am going to do - let her tell you herself.

But in the meantime here is a piece she did on aging… https://youtu.be/28z0mAxIDQw?si=yeIhBlmyrTPduOyO.    It is absolutely beautiful and, having tried my hand at some of this stuff over the years, absolutely impossible. It is a real mystery to me how Kelly is able to give her imaginary characters such powerfully emotive expressions while still feeling authentically human. Well, I plan to find that out on Thursday!

Another of her videos to watch is “Kids with AI Monsters” https://youtu.be/K8CY3OXaQ-w?si=CQxXndPUdfpVw4fp - brilliantly imagined and beautifully realized                                                                                                                                                                                                                              


I thought it was about time I worked on some content for our newer friends and decided that thisTuesday in Macro Talk I would do a section on the nuts and bolts of successful focus stacking. It will be basic but extensive, with a lot of useful information for seasoned stackers as well. I will do the whole thing as a start to finish demo. That is Tuesday, July 1, at 8pm. Here is your link … https://youtube.com/live/ur5Hxkq7iVY?feature=share


Thursday will be an unusual competition results program, during which I will go through all the images submitted to the June wild card macro competition. What makes it a big deal is that Cindi, my AI assistant, will also be judging this contest but I will not look at her results before we both see them during the program on Thursday. The aim is to find out how well she learned from studying the video recordings of all our prior contests. Now, my results are the only ones that will count for the official scoring, but we will take a close look at how Cindi arrived her scores and rankings. I will also give a brief report on how the process was completed and any problems that I might have run into. Here is your link for the program …https://youtube.com/live/FHtVil6KNRg?feature=share


And while we are at it, here is the competition theme for the month of July, 2025 - “Reptiles & Amphibians” - back to our usual handicapping rule - only one entry allowed from previous winners, two from everyone else. Your subject may be shot in the wild, or in captivity. The subject’s overall size is not an issue as long as your photograph is at 1:2 (one half life-size) or more - so on a full frame sensor you could get the entire animal in the frame if it is about 2.5 inches long. But most reptiles and amphibians are longer/larger than that as adults, so for a larger subject you will need to choose the body part you want to make the subject of your image (a snake’s head, the back of a tree frog, the tail of a spotted salamander).

A word of caution - if you are not very familiar with the snake species in your area, do not try to handle snakes. The vast majority of venomous species in the US are pit vipers, named for the large sensory cell-packed , pit-like depression in front of the eye and used for thermal imaging. These include several species of rattlesnakes (eastern diamondback, timber or canebrake, and various pygmy species), cottonmouths, and copperheads, For completeness I should also mention that the coral snake, a very venomous reptile, can rarely be found in the Deep South, and should not be handled by a non-professional). All snakes will, potentially, bite when handled but most are very tolerant of humans that don’t frighten them with sudden moves.

Your best bet is do not pick up any snake that you cannot readily and accurately identify as a venomous species And if you are not absolutely certain the snake you have found is safe to be bitten by, leave it along. If you aren’t comfortable around these lovely creatures, take a longer lens, 200-300mm and take your pictures from a respectable distance. If you want to see just how much fun “herping” can be, check out this YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@NKFherping - it may help you find a cool subject, or just inspire you to give it a shot, either way, he is a lot of fun to watch and the channel is full of reliable information about reptiles and amphibians across North America. Highly recommended viewing!


Pzoom is on Saturday at 10am and it will be a full morning, with introductions, updates, and lots of other stuff to talk about.

Your link and invitation is over on Patreon, in my latest post (should be out within 24 hours). I also have an exciting announcement for my Patreon supporters. Hope you can make it on Saturday.


I try not to talk about this unless it is absolutely necessary, but the channel is having a lean spell, with a few folks leaving Patreon and my affiliate payments dropping sharply. I don’t know if this is because they have reduced the fees or because fewer purchases are being made, but either way, income is down, expenses are up, and there is nothing in reserve. I have been planning to sell some merchandise through my website, but it appears that the costs of doing this (like getting a company to stock and mail the shirts and other items) would actually be higher than any profit I might have made. I really want to do this, even if it costs me, but right now I don’t have what it would cost to get the shirts made. Without going into all the gory details, I could sure use your help. The best way you can help is by joining Patreon and supporting my work through that platform. If that doesn’t work, you can always make a donation through the web site (https://www.allanwallsphotography.com/donations), or via PayPal - Every little bit helps and would be hugely appreciated! Thank you!

the size of a quarter, a newly minted slider



Lester Lefkowitz will be joining us on September 13th, in our Pzoom meeting to talk about his Lightroom organization strategy - something I don’t need to miss.


That’s it for this week! Hope to see out there!

PS… I don’t think that anyone got the riddle from last week’s post - the pictures were of a canine testes and the appendage of a bumble bee - or the “Dog’s Bol*ocks” and “Bees Knees”, both slang terms for a person, place, or thing that is clearly of above average quality. Another slang term with the same meaning might be “the cat’s pyjamas”. an example of where any of these three might be used would be… “Did you see that English macro guy’s livestream on Tuesday!? It was the bees knees!”.

Now you know…













  

The Best Macro Camera Body

Not All Macro Cameras Are Created Equal: A New Way to Score the Gear That Matters

If you've been around macro photography circles for any length of time, you've probably heard the eternal question: "What’s the best camera for macro?" It’s a question that inspires a lot of heated debate, some questionable recommendations, and far too many conversations about megapixels.

The awesome X2D 100C

But here’s the problem: most of those answers are either hopelessly vague ("just get a full-frame") or obsessively specific in a way that doesn’t help beginners. Even worse, they almost never distinguish between studio macro and field macro, which are as different as pipettes and pitchforks.

Another stunner - the sony a9

So I decided to do something about it.

One of the things I love about macro photography is the bright line separating field macro from studio macro. They really are very different pursuits that require very different skills. So is it remotely surprising that there are different equipment requirements? Of course not! In the past I have reviewed equipment for the field and studio gear separately, but that was a problem because there is quite a bit of overlap. So this is what I decided to do…
Evaluate all the popular cameras using a standard set of strictly objective criteria, with no review results or other subjective input. Then I would weight the criteria based on the relevance of that criteria to either field or studio macro.

Studio and Field: Two Different Worlds

In the studio, you control everything: light, temperature, background, and above all — motion. A typical setup might involve a camera mounted to a precision rail, connected to a computer, shooting dozens (or hundreds) of images for a stacked composite.

Out in the field, it’s you against the elements. You’re often working handheld, chasing skittish insects in variable light, sweating through weather-sealed gloves while trying to find a frog that doesn’t mind posing.

And yet, camera reviews keep treating these as the same use case.

The very capable X-T5 from fujifil


So I Built a Weighted Scoring Matrix

This week, I started assembling a completely transparent, objective scoring system for macro camera bodies. It evaluates cameras based on manufacturer specs only (no personal impressions or brand hype), and it treats studio and field macro as separate use cases.

The OM-!

The system uses a 0–10 score for each feature, then applies a weight, as noted above, depending on how important that feature is in a given context.

And here is the scoring matrix I came up with:

The weighted camera soring matrix

You can see how some features matter intensely in one environment and almost not at all in the other. And others are important in both. In this table I have listed the actual weights that I assigned for each:

This is an early iteration of the matrix

Canon’s amazin R5 mkII


The Cameras

You have already seen some of the cameras, but here is a list of all the models I included, along with base price and and links to both B&H and Amazon:


Every model gets two scores: one for studio macro, one for field macro.

The individual scores were computed based on the presence and quality of each of the features mentioned earlier. The scores were then modified based on the weighted values of those features, in the specific use case being evaluated. The scores were then tallied and placed in oder of the final tally

The K-1 mk II from Pentax


What’s Next

In today’s livestream I am going to share with you all the results from this fascinating experiment, some of which will surprise you, some of which won’t. But you won’t know unless you show up - here is your link - https://youtube.com/live/mOODxDG_IQ8?feature=share

In Thursday’s livestream (https://youtube.com/live/qyGxP1tvMYc?feature=share) , I’ll be revealing:

  1. The full ranking of cameras based on this scoring system

  2. Lens recommendations (including some non-camera lenses you may not expect!)

  3. My ultimate rig buildouts for the top 3 studio and field systems

Each system will be complete — camera, lens, rail, lighting, accessories. I’ll share images of the rigs and shopping links for those who want to follow along.

Why This Matters

This isn’t about proving which brand is best. It’s about choosing the right tool for your kind of macro work. Field photographers need weather sealing and stabilization. Studio shooters need resolution and control. No one needs marketing nonsense.

I hope this model helps you think more clearly about your own gear choices — and maybe challenges a few assumptions along the way.



Other Stuff you need to know about

Saturday is AfterStack 25 and I do hope you will be able to make it. We are going to have a little fun this weekend.

I am asking everyone who wants to come to  be prepared to tell us all about your favorite tool or niftiest trick in Photoshop. Surprise us! What do you do that nobody else has been smart enough to figure out? This is your chance to flash your chops and amaze the room with your deft handing of the pen tool (you get the idea). And bring a photo to  demonstrate your nifty moves on. The most interesting and unusual tip/tool/technique will win something. Probably not a car or a Hasselblad, but something cool anyway. Your invitation to the party is here -

Allan Walls is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: AfterStack 25

Time: Jun 14, 2025 10:00 AM Central Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6916802815?pwd=TS9tZi9ZL1NXeVUvOUF4eTg5YjdlZz09&omn=84313183886

Meeting ID: 691 680 2815

Passcode: 678122

OK gang - that’s it for this week! Congratulations to the winners of last month’s stereo contest! The video is out whenever you want to watch it!

See you Thursday.

-- Allan

Photographing Bees in Flight

Photographing Bees in Flight

Everything you ever wanted to know about photographing bees in flight from Australian macro photographer, Bruce Malcolm - Part interview, part tutorial, and a lot of fast talking!

Read More

Helicon or Zerene - choosing the right focus stacking software - Part I - Some Background

Helicon or Zerene - choosing the right focus stacking software - Part I - Some Background

Part I in a three part series where I look at the world’s two most popular focus stacking software programs and help you choose the right one for you. In Part I we take a close look at these two programs to find out what they really are.

Read More

Helicon or Zerene - Choosing the right focus stacking software - Part III - Conclusions

Helicon or Zerene - Choosing the right focus stacking software - Part III - Conclusions

In the final part of this three part discussion I summarize what has been learned during the evaluation period, I discuss my conclusions, and make some recommendations concerning stacking software selection.

Read More